What did BBC do after Scott Mills probe?

BBC knew about Scott Mills investigation, then acted later

BBC sources and reporting included in the provided items describe how the broadcaster was aware of a police probe involving Scott Mills in 2017, but did not sack him until later.

Key timeline details mentioned

• The BBC admitted it knew about a police investigation into Scott Mills in 2017.
• The BBC action followed “new information” becoming available last week (relative to the items).
• There is also mention that bosses were “unaware” the boy accusing Mills was under 16 at the time, implying the age factor became the deciding point.

Why it matters

This sequence is significant because it raises questions about institutional decision-making: when a high-profile presenter faces allegations tied to a historical police probe, the point at which an employer moves from internal awareness to termination can become central to public trust.

It also affects the scope of accountability for the broadcaster, since the story is framed not simply as “BBC responded after an allegation surfaced,” but as “BBC knew of a probe earlier and then waited,” with the later disciplinary step connected to additional details.

What the reporting does and doesn’t specify

• The excerpts focus on awareness, age-related context, and the timing of the sacking.
• They do not provide full investigative records, the identity of the complainant, or the complete chain of internal communications.

Overall, the takeaway is that the BBC’s knowledge existed years before the sacking, and the termination was linked to fresh information—particularly concerning the age of the person involved.